filigreefeline:

fussykitty:

This post is for anyone who has ever said that sexuality/romance “doesn’t belong in a children’s cartoon”.  I want you to look long and hard at this collection of images.  They are all actual screencaps of cartoons aimed at children.  Now that you have processed these images, I want you to realise one thing: these are all expressions of sexuality and romance.  And you’re quite content for your children to take in these images and ideas.  Here’s a little spoiler for you: these kisses are more sexual than two people simply maybe having feelings for each other.  Yet, if they happen to be two girls or two boys, they’re automatically more dirty and inappropriate than highly intimate open-mouthed kisses.
Protip: before you complain that children are too young for sexuality, remember that sexuality is everywhere in children’s entertainment.  Then do us all a favour and shut the fuck up.

This is an amazing post and you should feel amazing. 

filigreefeline:

fussykitty:

This post is for anyone who has ever said that sexuality/romance “doesn’t belong in a children’s cartoon”.  I want you to look long and hard at this collection of images.  They are all actual screencaps of cartoons aimed at children.  Now that you have processed these images, I want you to realise one thing: these are all expressions of sexuality and romance.  And you’re quite content for your children to take in these images and ideas.  Here’s a little spoiler for you: these kisses are more sexual than two people simply maybe having feelings for each other.  Yet, if they happen to be two girls or two boys, they’re automatically more dirty and inappropriate than highly intimate open-mouthed kisses.

Protip: before you complain that children are too young for sexuality, remember that sexuality is everywhere in children’s entertainment.  Then do us all a favour and shut the fuck up.

This is an amazing post and you should feel amazing. 

  1. shinofukazewolfd7 reblogged this from shanasblue
  2. shanasblue reblogged this from thirsty-pocket
  3. alexanan-nyla reblogged this from thirsty-pocket
  4. thirsty-pocket reblogged this from kerogero
  5. kerogero reblogged this from chamberofgallifrey
  6. chamberofgallifrey reblogged this from kyogre
  7. kelseylove5 reblogged this from letsgetweird1113
  8. freshprinceprs reblogged this from letsgetweird1113
  9. letsgetweird1113 reblogged this from albinwonderland
  10. sonrisashermosas reblogged this from kikeduh
  11. kikeduh reblogged this from natii-natz
  12. redandbluemakegreen reblogged this from albinwonderland
  13. strawhatpirate9 reblogged this from scuttlebuttink
  14. phthalocyanine reblogged this from dualitier
  15. b-lynninja reblogged this from laetatus-sum and added:
    I would argue that pretty much all of Disney’s adaptations were very much kid-ified. They were not suitable for children...
  16. laetatus-sum reblogged this from bitterseafigtree and added:
    The Hunchback of Notre Dame was Disney’s adaptation of Victor Hugo’s Notre Dame de Paris. That story is definitely not...
  17. thesweets2011 reblogged this from kateclappblog
  18. bitterseafigtree reblogged this from albinwonderland
  19. evil-doodler reblogged this from wwizarderi
  20. cesoircestlafin reblogged this from indigoire
  21. savarend reblogged this from dualitier
  22. bisexualhappiness reblogged this from cosineofdanger
  23. grrrl-anachronism reblogged this from hareteeth
  24. hareteeth reblogged this from smooooch
  25. irankamurr reblogged this from kateclappblog
  26. inkstainedchocolateeyes reblogged this from schrader99
  27. cleanslateforablankmind reblogged this from caterpillar-cousin and added:
    This post is for anyone who has ever said that sexuality/romance “doesn’t belong in a children’s cartoon”. I want you to...
  28. shastablue reblogged this from shaggystephen
  29. stealingawesome reblogged this from homoerotics