ALRIGHT YOU LITTLE SHITS

rosenkristall:

TUMBLR AND IT’S FUTURE IS AT STAKE HERE

SIGN AND REBLOG IF YOU WANT TO SAVE TUMBLR FROM YAHOO

SIGNAL BOOST

Tags: signal boost

Women invented all the core technologies that made civilization possible. This isn’t some feminist myth; it’s what modern anthropologists believe. Women are thought to have invented pottery, basketmaking, weaving, textiles, horticulture, and agriculture. That’s right: without women’s inventions, we wouldn’t be able to carry things or store things or tie things up or go fishing or hunt with nets or haft a blade or wear clothes or grow our food or live in permanent settlements. Suck on that.

Women have continued to be involved in the creation and advancement of civilization throughout history, whether you know it or not. Pick anything—a technology, a science, an art form, a school of thought—and start digging into the background. You’ll find women there, I guarantee, making critical contributions and often inventing the damn shit in the first place.

Women have made those contributions in spite of astonishing hurdles. Hurdles like not being allowed to go to school. Hurdles like not being allowed to work in an office with men, or join a professional society, or walk on the street, or own property. Example: look up Lise Meitner some time. When she was born in 1878 it was illegal in Austria for girls to attend school past the age of 13. Once the laws finally eased up and she could go to university, she wasn’t allowed to study with the men. Then she got a research post but wasn’t allowed to use the lab on account of girl cooties. Her whole life was like this, but she still managed to discover nuclear fucking fission. Then the Nobel committee gave the prize to her junior male colleague and ignored her existence completely.

Men in all patriarchal civilizations, including ours, have worked to downplay or deny women’s creative contributions. That’s because patriarchy is founded on the belief that women are breeding stock and men are the only people who can think. The easiest way for men to erase women’s contributions is to simply ignore that they happened. Because when you ignore something, it gets forgotten. People in the next generation don’t hear about it, and so they grow up thinking that no women have ever done anything. And then when women in their generation do stuff, they think “it’s a fluke, never happened before in the history of the world, ignore it.” And so they ignore it, and it gets forgotten. And on and on and on. The New York Times article is a perfect illustration of this principle in action.

Finally, and this is important: even those women who weren’t inventors and intellectuals, even those women who really did spend all their lives doing stereotypical “women’s work”—they also built this world. The mundane labor of life is what makes everything else possible. Before you can have scientists and engineers and artists, you have to have a whole bunch of people (and it’s usually women) to hold down the basics: to grow and harvest and cook the food, to provide clothes and shelter, to fetch the firewood and the water, to nurture and nurse, to tend and teach. Every single scrap of civilized inventing and dreaming and thinking rides on top of that foundation. Never forget that.

from a post by Reclusive Leftist on women’s erasure in history. 

her comments relate specifically to an article by the NYT thanking “the men” who invented modern technology, but pick absolutely any academic field of study, and women’s contributions are minimized, if not outright ignored.

literature has been a huge part of my life for a long time, and i grew up reading the classics—which, of course, are typically books written by white men, depicting their experiences. i was taught that the first “modern novel” was Don Quixote, written in the early 1600s by a guy (Cervantes). i don’t think i know of a word to accurately describe my mixture of outrage, shock, and pride, when i discovered later that actually, the first modern novel was written 600 years earlier—by a woman! (it’s The Tale of Genji, written by a Japanese lady-in-waiting who was known as Murasaki Shikibu.)

this might not seem important, but if you’re a woman you know just how vital this knowledge is. even now, when women are being told that we can do anything we set our minds to, the historical, literary, and scientific figures we learn about are all men. it’s a much more insidious way to discourage women from aiming high—because what’s the point in putting in so much hard work if it’s not even going to be remembered after you’re dead?

(via sendforbromina)

Reblogged from Ahead of her Time
steampoweredcupcake:

giraffesonparade:

amazingincrediblespiderhulk:

sorveharth:

OH MY GOD THEY’RE COPYCATS


I thought they were getting “Cat Scans”

I bet they left a lot of “paw prints”

steampoweredcupcake:

giraffesonparade:

amazingincrediblespiderhulk:

sorveharth:

OH MY GOD THEY’RE COPYCATS

I thought they were getting “Cat Scans”

I bet they left a lot of “paw prints

chaniatreides:

rarely-pure-never-simple:

le-jardine-dueden:

arachnis-deathicus:

Gonna quickly throw in an epic quote I found on this article.

KJKJ: Gene Roddenberry, with balls of brass, got up on national tv and said, “hey people, if a geneticist took all the best DNA from planet Earth and put it together to make the best human the world has ever seen - he wouldn’t be a white guy.”

This is why I find the casting of a white actor in this role to be so repugnant. They are not whitewashing an Asian role, they are saying that the best genetic material that the entirety of this world and it’s diversity has to offer….still comes from a white guy.

Do people realize that Khan has never been played by an Asian? The character is a genetically modified being sooo….he doesn’t have to necessarily come out Asian.

^THIS.

Also i really think what we are saying is….

“the best genetic material that the entirety of this world and it’s diversity has to offer…”

IS BENEDICT CUMBERBATCH.

ding dong you are completely fucking wrong

Khan’s character (at least in the new movie) was supposed to be a genetically modified human made of the best genes from people all around the world. If he really had had genes from all over, his skin color would be significantly darker. That’s just according to genetics and science.

Now, Khan in the original was played by a man named Ricardo Montalbán, a Mexican actor. Khan was actually a North Indian Sikh, and both his parents were from India. Obviously, there are complications with a Mexican actor playing an Indian role, and the original was certainly not perfect—but it showed that people of color are not savage and violent. Khan was intelligent—really fucking intelligent—and was a damn fine piece of ass too.

And then here comes JJ Abrams with his lensflares and misogyny and turns a powerful, dynamic, intelligent, cunning person of color into a white guy. Yeah, the product of the best genes in the world is gonna be a white guy. Way to go, JJ, way to fucking go.

Reblogged from Spock & Uhura
bloochikin:

Decided to color it on a whim. 12 HOURS @____@ 
And yes, Marie is smoking in the classroom before others show up cuz she give no fucks. 
I’m tired now

bloochikin:

Decided to color it on a whim. 12 HOURS @____@ 

And yes, Marie is smoking in the classroom before others show up cuz she give no fucks. 

I’m tired now